<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oris Men&#8217;s Williams F1 Chronograph Automatic Watch #673 7563 4184MB</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.classicluxurywatches.com/oris/oris-mens-williams-f1-chronograph-automatic-watch-673-7563-4184mb.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.classicluxurywatches.com/oris/oris-mens-williams-f1-chronograph-automatic-watch-673-7563-4184mb.html</link>
	<description>Explore 5,000+ Watches. Save On Reviews Luxury Watches.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:39:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan P.</title>
		<link>http://www.classicluxurywatches.com/oris/oris-mens-williams-f1-chronograph-automatic-watch-673-7563-4184mb.html/comment-page-1#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.classicluxurywatches.com/oris/oris-mens-williams-f1-chronograph-automatic-watch-673-7563-4184mb.html#comment-279</guid>
		<description>I bought this watch after looking at it for about 2 years.  I&#039;ve owned it 6 months now.  This was my first &quot;luxury&quot; watch purchase and overall I&#039;m satisfied.  It&#039;s a good looking watch and I often get compliments.  However, I have three complaints.  First is that it loses time, maybe 30 seconds a day.  This bothered me more when it was new, now it&#039;s just a minor inconvenience; 100 years ago, it might have been a more significant problem.  Secondly, it would be nice to have a longer power reserve.  Once again, not a deal breaker, but an inconvenience.  Lastly and most significantly, I can feel some &quot;roughness&quot; in the bearing for the counterweight.  This is the most disappointing part as I now question the quality of the internals.  To recap, I&#039;m happy with it, but if I was going to purchase again, I maybe would have went with the day-date version for less than half the price.
Rating: 4 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this watch after looking at it for about 2 years.  I&#8217;ve owned it 6 months now.  This was my first &#8220;luxury&#8221; watch purchase and overall I&#8217;m satisfied.  It&#8217;s a good looking watch and I often get compliments.  However, I have three complaints.  First is that it loses time, maybe 30 seconds a day.  This bothered me more when it was new, now it&#8217;s just a minor inconvenience; 100 years ago, it might have been a more significant problem.  Secondly, it would be nice to have a longer power reserve.  Once again, not a deal breaker, but an inconvenience.  Lastly and most significantly, I can feel some &#8220;roughness&#8221; in the bearing for the counterweight.  This is the most disappointing part as I now question the quality of the internals.  To recap, I&#8217;m happy with it, but if I was going to purchase again, I maybe would have went with the day-date version for less than half the price.<br />
Rating: 4 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
